THE AIVO METHOD

Four stages to a decision-grade read.

One method, named for the company. Every stage feeds a single read reported as a 95% confidence range and traceable to the prompts, responses, and pages behind it.

HOW WE OPERATE

We sit between the platform data and the work your teams do.

Monitoring tools produce data. Agencies and internal teams produce work. The layer in between decides which numbers are real and which work is worth doing, and it is the layer most brands do not have.

Below us: the data

Raw platform output, your monitoring tool, your analytics. Useful, noisy, and unable to tell you on its own whether a change means anything.

Us: the read

We sample the platforms ourselves, establish what is stable and what is drift, and decide which findings carry commercial weight. Everything we report carries a range and an evidence trail.

Above us: the work

Your content, PR, and technical teams, and the agencies you already use. We write the briefs. They execute. We can measure it afterward because we had no hand in it.

GOVERNING PRINCIPLES

The rules we do not break.

The discipline behind every range we publish.

Ranges, never ranks or points

95% confidence intervals are the default (calculated using the Wilson score interval).

Confidence over volume

The pitch is the range, not the run count.

Sample the default experience

Every read uses the current default model per platform, because that is what users receive.

Control first

The baseline is an unpersonalized, zero-history state, so segment effects are measured as departures from a known control.

Training vs retrieval view

Separate what the model knows from what it looks up.

Brand vs category lens

Direct brand queries and category queries measured separately.

Traceable to evidence

Every finding cites prompts, responses, and citations.

Independent. Never the fix.

AIVO measures and refers remediation out.

A

STAGE 01· before the clock

Architecture

Decide what matters to the business and size the sampling for a defensible read.

Yields

Prompt architecture · sampling design

I

STAGE 02

Interrogation

Sample the platforms as a default user sees them and capture everything the answer reveals.

Yields

Raw packet (client keeps) · enriched dataset

V

STAGE 03

Value-mapping

Turn observation into a short list of what is worth acting on, in priority order.

Yields

Executive read · 90-day roadmap

O

STAGE 04

Operationalize

Hand the team the briefs, plan, and measurement to act. Refer the fix out.

Yields

Workbook · briefs · PM plan · measurement

Every stage resolves to 95% confidenceObserved rate + Confidence interval

Every finding is a range at 95% confidence, and every range traces back to the prompts, responses, and pages behind it, so you can reproduce any number we report.

THE SUBJECT

Eight representation dimensions.

What the method measures across every stage and every read.

Presence

When a relevant prompt is asked, does the brand appear at all, and how often.

Comparison

When named against a competitive set, how does AI position the brand relative to others.

Recommendation

Beyond mention, how likely is AI to actually pick or endorse the brand.

Accuracy

Is what AI says true, and where is it wrong in a way that carries commercial or accountability weight.

Sentiment

Warm, neutral, or hostile, and toward which audience.

Sources

Where AI draws its picture of the brand, and how much of that the brand can influence.

Access

Can the platforms technically read and ingest the brand's own properties.

Audiences

How representation shifts across audience segments and personas.

Know what AI says about you.
And how sure you can be.

Independent measurement of how AI represents your brand. One market, one language, delivered in 7 to 14 business days.

30-minute scoping call · no commitment