Original Research · April 2026

The Brand AI Engines Recommend When You Ask About Sneakers

We tested 1,500 queries across 5 AI engines, 18 footwear brands, and 2 languages (EN/ES) to discover which brands dominate AI recommendations — and which ones are invisible. Presented at POSSIBLE 2026.

100
Prompts Tested
18
Brands Tracked
5
AI Engines
1,500
Total Queries
EN + ES
Languages
Finding #1

The Crocs Dominance

Crocs is the #1 most-mentioned brand across all 5 AI engines. With 1,435 total mentions, it nearly doubles the runner-up (New Balance at 833). Every single engine picks Crocs first.

OpenAI
GPT-5.4
#1 Brand
Crocs logoCrocs
334 mentions
Gemini
Gemini 2.5 Flash
#1 Brand
Crocs logoCrocs
363 mentions
Perplexity
Sonar
#1 Brand
Crocs logoCrocs
250 mentions
Claude
Sonnet 4.6
#1 Brand
Crocs logoCrocs
347 mentions
Google AIO
AI Overview
#1 Brand
Crocs logoCrocs
141 mentions

crocs.com faviconCrocs: The Unanimous AI Champion

Not only does Crocs lead every engine, it performs even better in Spanish-language queries (745 ES vs 690 EN). This comfort-first brand has achieved the kind of AI omnipresence that Nike and Adidas have in traditional search. The question isn't whether Crocs is visible — it's whether anyone can catch up.

1,435total mentions
1.7xmore than #2 (New Balance)
Finding #2

Full Brand Visibility Rankings

Each brand's AI Visibility Score (0–100) measures how often it appears across 1,500 queries. The gap between digital-native brands and legacy names tells a clear story about what AI values.

Visibility Score = % of queries where the brand was mentioned by AI engines. Higher is better.

1
Crocs logoCrocs
1,435
96
2
New Balance logoNew Balance
833
56
3
Nike logoNike
620
41
4
Adidas logoAdidas
562
37
5
HOKA logoHOKA
542
36
6
Skechers logoSkechers
458
31
7
Birkenstock logoBirkenstock
404
27
8
Vans logoVans
403
27
9
Converse logoConverse
262
17
10
Puma logoPuma
203
14
11
On Running logoOn Running
186
12
12
Hey Dude logoHey Dude
128
9
13
Salomon logoSalomon
76
5
14
UGG logoUGG
72
5
15
Teva logoTeva
57
4
16
Merrell logoMerrell
55
4
17
OOFOS logoOOFOS
37
2
18
Native Shoes logoNative Shoes
13
1
Finding #3

The Language Split: EN vs ES

Some brands see dramatically different AI visibility depending on whether users ask in English or Spanish. Comfort and lifestyle brands gain in Spanish; performance-outdoor brands lose.

Brand
English (EN)
Spanish (ES)
Change
Skechers logoSkechers
179
279
+56%
Puma logoPuma
81
122
+51%
Crocs logoCrocs
690
745
+8%
HOKA logoHOKA
314
228
-27%
On Running logoOn Running
115
71
-38%
Teva logoTeva
42
15
-64%
Merrell logoMerrell
44
11
-75%

The Language Insight

Performance-outdoor brands (HOKA, On Running, Merrell, Teva) lose significant visibility in Spanish, while comfort/lifestyle brands (Skechers, Puma, Crocs) gain. This suggests AI engines draw from different source material per language — Spanish-language content favors mass-market comfort brands with stronger LATAM distribution and brand awareness.

Finding #4

Engine Personalities

Each AI engine has a distinct recommendation style — from the most generous (OpenAI, 1,099 brand mentions) to the most selective (Claude, 757). They don't just pick the same brands differently; they think about footwear differently.

OpenAI
1,099
Brand Mentions
Avg 1,807 chars/response
Most Generous
Gemini
801
Brand Mentions
Avg 3,693 chars/response
Longest Responses
Perplexity
778
Brand Mentions
Avg 1,837 chars/response
Balanced
Google AIO
760
Brand Mentions
3,595 chars · 82 failures
Most Failures
Claude
757
Brand Mentions
Avg 2,172 chars/response
Most Selective
OpenAI Top 3
Crocs logoCrocs334
New Balance logoNew Balance203
Skechers logoSkechers134
Gemini Top 3
Crocs logoCrocs363
New Balance logoNew Balance178
Nike logoNike143
Perplexity Top 3
Crocs logoCrocs250
New Balance logoNew Balance167
HOKA logoHOKA145
Google AIO Top 3
Crocs logoCrocs141
Adidas logoAdidas112
Nike logoNike98
Claude Top 3
Crocs logoCrocs347
New Balance logoNew Balance218
HOKA logoHOKA156
Finding #5

The Long Tail

Below the top 6, footwear brands fall off a cliff. The bottom 6 combined have fewer mentions than New Balance alone.

Salomon logoSalomon
76
Mentions
UGG logoUGG
72
Mentions
Teva logoTeva
57
Mentions
Merrell logoMerrell
55
Mentions
OOFOS logoOOFOS
37
Mentions
Native Shoes logoNative Shoes
13
Mentions

The AI Visibility Cliff

Performance and outdoor brands (Salomon, Teva, Merrell, OOFOS) are nearly invisible to AI engines despite strong specialty retail presence. Even Hey Dude — owned by Crocs — couldn't leverage its parent brand's AI dominance.

310combined mentions (bottom 6)
833Crocs alone
Hypothesis Scorecard

Did We Confirm the Research Hypotheses?

Before running the study, we set 4 hypotheses about footwear AI visibility. Here's how they held up against 1,500 data points.

H1
"Nike and Adidas dominate AI footwear recommendations due to their marketing dominance." Not supported. Crocs (#1, 1,435 mentions) dominates all engines. Nike ranks #3 with 620 mentions — less than half of Crocs.
Not Supported
H2
"Performance brands (HOKA, On Running) outperform lifestyle brands in AI." Not confirmed. HOKA (#5) ranks below Crocs, New Balance, Nike, and Adidas. On Running ranks #11.
Not Confirmed
H3
"Spanish-language prompts produce significantly different brand rankings." Confirmed. Skechers +56% in Spanish, Merrell -75%. The top brand (Crocs) is consistent but relative rankings shift.
Confirmed
H4
"All engines agree on the category leader." Strongly confirmed. All 5 engines unanimously pick Crocs as #1 — the only study in our research history with 100% engine consensus.
Strongly Confirmed
Methodology

How We Built This Study

A fully automated AI visibility research pipeline powered by AIVO's proprietary Research Engine.

Research Design

  • 100 prompts (50 EN + 50 ES) × 5 engines × 3 runs = 1,500 queries
  • 18 footwear brands tracked across athletic, casual, comfort, luxury, and performance segments
  • US market, bilingual (English + Spanish)
  • Study period: April 2026

AI Engines Tested

  • OpenAI — GPT-5.4
  • Perplexity — Sonar
  • Gemini — Gemini 2.5 Flash
  • Claude — Sonnet 4.6
  • Google AIO — AI Overview
  • All tested with web search enabled for real-time grounding

Brand Extraction

  • Claude Sonnet 4 used as analysis engine for brand extraction
  • Extracts: brand mentions, brand positioning, recommendation context, sentiment
  • 4,195 total brand mentions captured and attributed

Study Details

  • Fully automated end-to-end research pipeline
  • 3 independent runs per prompt for consistency validation
  • Zero manual intervention from prompt to analysis
  • Presented at POSSIBLE 2026 (April 27–29)

Ready to benchmark your brand's AI visibility?

Get a personalized analysis of how your brand performs across ChatGPT, Google AI, and Perplexity— plus actionable recommendations to improve your visibility.

View More Research
Free 30-minute consultation
Custom benchmark report
No commitment required

Related analysis

The AI search visibility data from 1M+ citations, and why the brands winning are not the ones spending the most.

AI Doesn't Recommend Who You Think

More AIVO Research

View all industry research →